Citation Hunt

The Wikipedia snippet below is not backed by a reliable source. Can you find one?

Click I got this! to go to Wikipedia and fix the snippet, or Next! to see another one. Good luck!

In page Rights of nature in Ecuador:

This text has been unreferenced on Wikipedia for a very long time. If you can't find a source, be bold and remove it!

"

Ecuador has taken action towards an ecocentric influenced constitution, giving nature legal, constitutional rights. This means that Ecuador has recognized nature, or Pachamama, as a capable and deserving right-bearing entity that is equal to humans. The Rights of Nature also transforms the relationship between nature and humans by asserting that nature is not just an object.[2] By putting ecosystems on an equal footing with humans, the conception of humans as masters or as separate from nature is dismissed.[3] Instead, this system celebrates nature and recognizes that humans are a part of it.[4] Many have thought this to be part of progressivism and related it to other examples of progression such as homosexual rights and the rights of women.[citation needed]